Making Climate Capital Work
Unlocking capital investment for South Africa’s Just Energy Transition
Authors:
Eliza Macmillan-Scott, Katherine Stodulka, Mark Meldrum and Mike Kennedy (Blended Finance Taskforce), and Professor Mark Swilling, Nina Callaghan, Dr. Nthabi Mohlakoana, and Erica Johnson (Centre for Sustainability Transitions)

Abstract:
The report entitled “Making Climate Capital Work” produced in 2022 by Centre for Sustainability Transition at Stellenbosch University and the Blended Finance Taskforce. This report comes after the $8,5 billion (bln) pledge by the International Partner Group. The reports offered a strategic framework for South Africa’s Just Energy Transition, focusing on how the $8,5 bln can be used as the catalyst for the $250 billion estimate required to transform the country’s electricity system between 2022 and 2050.
While the $8.5 billion pledge represents only about 3% of the total $250 billion need, the report argues it can be a “fit-for-purpose” catalyst if deployed correctly. The total capital requirement is estimated to be $250 bln. The investment requirement is categorised into five categories:
- Renewable Energy ($125bln): Targeted installation of 150 GW of wind and solar by 2050
- Grid Infrastructure ($50 bln): Evenly split between transmission($25 bln) and distribution ($25 bln) to connect remote renewable zones to demand centre
- Flexibility and Storage ($44 bln):∗∗Including battery storage($18 bln), gas for flexibility ($18 bln),and pumped hydro($8 bln)
- Coal Decommissioning ($24 bln): Concessional funding to offset profits foregone by the early retirement of coal plants by 2040
- Climate Justice Outcomes (Up to $10 bln): Supporting the 125,000 workers in the coal value chain through compensation, retraining, and relocation, alongside community rehabilitation.
The report also offers a critical view on the risk of the $8,5 bln becoming a “cautionary tale” rather a blueprint. This is because of evidence suggests the majority of the pledge consists of sovereign loans with limited concessional terms, rather than the grants needed for “non-investable” social costs and coal decommissioning. Furthermore, there is significant scepticism due to fragmented coordination between donors and a lack of clarity regarding the terms and source of funds. To address these concerns, there is a need for deeper engagement with South African financial institutions (like the DBSA and IDC) and civil society to ensure the funding is demand driven.
Categories:
reference:
Publication date:
June 2022